I felt like sharing this article because I haven't found texts that approach the subject with the perspective I bring here — I hope you enjoy it —.
I'll start with this epigraph: wherever there is play, there will always be some manipulation, with characters tasked with prostituting good habits and good customs.
In principle, every human has the capacity — to a greater or lesser degree — to optimize their medium mechanism. Some are born with a neural configuration such that this mechanism runs super-powered, although the focus tends to be very specific. For example, speaking with deceased people. That's only part of mediumship, it doesn't define it — I'll expand on this shortly —. Everyone uses their abilities in their own way; nothing is really right or wrong, it's simply different.
Every extrasensory capacity is subject to a particular — unique — neural dynamic. Often, and paradoxically, that same dynamic keeps the individual from being able to manage those capacities, causing disorders and conflicts of every kind. In other words, extrasensory capacity requires emotional coefficient — directly proportional to each other —. If this doesn't happen, there will be many missteps in that individual's life. Their handling of it could be quite erratic, though eventually positive — it's very relative —. This applies not only to mediumship, but also to telepathy, telekinesis, clairvoyance, and everything parapsychology addresses.
Let me open a parenthesis. Parapsychology, esotericism, and metaphysics all tend to be interpreted in a very subjective way, because psychotronic science — born around the 1950s — isn't widely known. In fact, there's nothing very concrete about it. However, and as it happens, that science is the one that has sprung from me, and today I redefine it as Neuropsychotronics — modern parapsychology —. Through it, I can objectively explain and justify what gets interpreted as subjective. And I do so through a logical symbiosis between universal principles and the well-known laws of physics.
Back to the narrative. Mediums, in general, can be exposed to the prejudices of those who are unaware of these conditions, and even more so when disinformation through manipulation is added to the mix. Clearly there are also frauds and charlatans out there, not real mediums, but you'll find those everywhere. Even back in Freud's time, that same manipulation I'm describing was already showing up. In those days, neurological clinical trials were carried out within spiritist sessions with mediums, but the conclusive results weren't published — they were hidden.
Logically, medium refers to being a means, a channel. The question is, a channel for what. In the case of those who deliver messages from the deceased, it's clear they're establishing a bridge between themselves and the consciousness of the departed. But someone capable of building a bridge between what we believe we are and that which creates what we believe we are is also a medium, because they're creating a bridge between themselves and their supraconsciousness — this mechanic is also known as quantum unfolding —. The bridge in question requires hypnosis, which means "the great synapse that allows awakening" — in simple words, we're talking about self-listening with progressive fidelity, and that's what I try to induce in the patient during a session —. When that hypnosis manages to tune in perfectly through constant practice, a prevailing mediumship arises, which little by little allows the degree of consciousness to be optimized, and with it, the emotional coefficient — which was also required beforehand —. This condition will gradually allow for optimal mastery of every extrasensory capacity — which generally takes years —.
The channels that many of us medium-therapists establish have greater or lesser definition — they're more or less fidelity-locked — and are subject to multiple factors, starting with the parameters of electrical energy — voltage and intensity, amplitude and frequency —. Imagine a phone call full of noise and interference; it's something like that, which is why listening is so important. In every case, there will be electromagnetic interventions that alter judgment, to a greater or lesser degree — they can be interpreted as infections, or bioplasmic parasitizations —. This is where the great importance of emotional coefficient and training with yogic discipline — dharmakaya — comes in too. That's how those injurious circumstances get subdued — what some will romantically call ghosts drawn in by our own demons —. This is where we, as therapists, must lead by example, beyond our own flaws — the erratic isn't the problem, denying it is —.
In my particular case, I understand this training as an infinite school, so I accept that I'll never fully finish learning. However, my ego also allows me to accept that I've achieved a certain mastery, and because of that, with gratitude, I can help those who seek out my chiropractic hypnotherapy, and with humility and confidence, lead by example.
I know my profession is quite controversial, because it touches sensitive nerves, but don't take any of it personally. I admire those who excel in their own profession — because they enjoy it and are empirical experts —. It would be wonderful if that were reciprocal, and if it isn't, I have no choice but to accept it anyway.
I'd love to go into more depth, to explain in psychotronic terms how the medium's connection or bridge actually works, but it's not something that can simply be intellectualized — it's truly empirical, the same way endogenous science is. I'll just leave you with this last point: conventional science calls that electrical neural connection — uncommon in humans, they say — a gap synapse. And of course, if one doesn't train to achieve this kind of synaptogenesis, most neurotransmitters will only form as chemical structure, and that's where pathological synapse, or neurosis, proliferates — in the waters that electrolysis, the electric current of the gap synapse, breaks apart. That's how a high intellectual coefficient can be hiding a high degree of neurosis, even when it seems like the opposite — as if it were some grand display —. Every great IQ should be the consequence of a great EQ — emotional coefficient, intelligence —; otherwise, sooner or later it will bring a great emotional crisis, something like a computing call to a very well-known function: karma — an algorithm that answers to another, the principle of cause and effect —. What I'm sharing here isn't only part of my study; the one writing this — me — has been his own lab rat — and it's been rough —.
Now, before judging a medium, no matter how ridiculous he or she may act, just breathe and become aware of all this. The only real thing is individual experience. If you don't understand what's happening, be aware that it's only your experience, and accept that you're not understanding it. And if you do form a judgment, note it as such — as your judgment, not as an absolute truth, only a relative one. A medium, or a clairvoyant, or whatever you want to call it, is not a jukebox meant to do whatever you ask whenever you ask it — that would be violent and disrespectful on your part. And as I already mentioned, it's also true that there are frauds, or fools, everywhere. But if we're truly coherent and kind, let's lead by example in every aspect of our lives, as much as we can.
This article could be considered an opinion, but one grounded in my study — empirical and clinical verification —. It's part of my essay and of my profession, so don't take it personally. It isn't an absolute truth, only a truth that invites discernment.